Romance in the Ivory Tower: The Rights and Liberty of Conscience. Paul R. Abramson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2007. Pp. 176. $18.95, cloth. ISBN: 978-0-262-01237-9. TEL: 617-253-5643

Many universities prohibit romantic relationships between faculty members and student, and professors who transgress are usually out of a job. Abramson takes aim at university policies that forbid relationships between faculty members and students. He argues that the issue of faculty-student romances goes beyond the seemingly trivial matter of who sleeps with whom and engages our fundamental constitutional rights.

By what authority, Abramson asks, did the university become the arbiter of romantic etiquette among consenting adults? Do we, as consenting adults, have a constitutional right to make intimate choices as long as they do not cause harm? He contends that we do, and bases this claim on two arguments. He suggests that the Ninth Amendment (which states that the Constitution’s enumeration of certain rights should not be construed to deny others) protects the “right to romance.” And, he argues, the “right to romance” is a fundamental right of conscience—as are freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

Campus romances happen. The important question is not whether they should be encouraged or prohibited but whether the choice to engage in such a relationship should be protected or precluded. Abramson argues that our freedom to make choices—to worship, make a political speech, or fall in love—is fundamental. Rules forbidding faculty-student romances, he says, are not only unconstitutional but set dangerous precedents for further intrusion into rights of privacy and conscience.

Back to Main Review Page

Click below to buy this book

© 2008 Prakken Publications, Inc.